His expertise spans statements related to the individual rights work, education law, equality states, sexual abuse, tension and bullying, property harm and lawsuit involving allegations of data breaches, the mistreatment of private info and defamation.Ian for numerous years was a prosecutor for the Club Standards Panel and offers appeared before a range of regulatory tribunals.
Ian furthermore represents Claimants and Defendants in expert indemnity instances and claims for scientific negligence. Clarke v Nottingham Town Council (2019): Effectively defended a private injury state involving novel and essential quarrels about the rescuer concept. X v A County Council (2019) Challenging stress and bullying state with hard problems of causation McCllelland sixth is v The Chief Constable of Sussex (wasted expenses)(2019): Profitable application seeking costs directly from the Claimants solicitors. McCllelland v The Main Constable of Sussex: Profitable defence of a high court claim for assault and break of the HRA adhering to the Claimant getting become tasered by the Defendants officials. Obtained overview verdict in a complicated Equality action claim and charge dispute pertaining to a leading English public school. An Official v Uk Transport Law enforcement: Showed the BTP in a data protection action claim related to the handling of disciplinary issues. Brighthouse v Tazegul 2016 EWHC 2277(QB): Successfully addressing the Accused in an program seeking to fixed apart a verdict obtained by scams. Sultan v The Club Standards Panel LTL 8112013: served for thé BSB in á claim concerning a functioning barristers failing to acquire his practising certificate. The failure constituted professional misconduct; the fact that he eventually paid the charge and obtained the certificate seven weeks late did not allow him to backdaté its validity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |